The Cincinnati Reds reportedly have about $30M to spend this year. That is according to Paul Daugherty of the Cincinnati Enquirer. It’s buried in fifth paragraph of an article he wrote on Wednesday morning. Talk about burying the lede.

That, if correct, would put the Reds at about $130,000,000 for payroll in 2019. Over the weekend we looked at some of the players that the Reds could possibly target and what their contracts could be. On Monday it came out at the General Manager Meetings that the Reds were interested in starting pitchers Patrick Corbin, Dallas Keuchel, and J.A. Happ. Two of those three are the types who would never have been on past Reds radar. They would require too much money for too many years. The Reds have never played in that kind of market in free agency.

What kind of contract would those guys be looking at? Well, it depends on who you ask. We already saw what two experts thought over the weekend. Since then MLB Trade Rumors and Fangraphs Kiley McDaniel have also weighed in. Here

What could the Reds do with their money?

The MLB Trade Rumors expectations are higher in two of the three player projections. The money is there to sign any one of these guys. If the numbers are perfect on the low-end, maybe they could land J.A. Happ and one of the other two. That would be highly unlikely. First, I believe that the Reds would need to pay more than “market” to get anyone to come in. They have been a bad team for quite a while. If another team is making the same offer, the odds are very good a player would choose the team more likely to win. Unfortunately, that’s not Cincinnati right now. Toss in that the team is also focusing on pitching, and the ballpark plays another role. Fair or unfair, the perception is the ballpark hurt pitching. You probably need to pay a little more to get someone to choose Cincinnati over a team who doesn’t have a “ballpark issue”.

That, of course, only focuses on pitching. And it only focuses on the free agents. The Reds could look at trading for a player. Or they could look into bringing in a free agent position player. They may even look into bringing in some help for the bullpen, too. With all of the talk they’ve made in the last two weeks, they almost HAVE TO sign one of the above starting pitchers or a lot of the fanbase will view the offseason as a failure and a lie. That is, unless they make a big trade to bring in someone on par with one of those guys.

DALTON AND GREEN IN 2018 T SHIRT

38 Responses

  1. Billy

    I think the Reds can be more competitive in the trade market than the free agent market, where the ballpark/bad team penalty hurts them more, right? Suppose they made a big move for someone like Paxton, Kluber, or Carrasco. What could they get with the money left over to plug any holes (Winker? Senzel?) that such a trade might create?

    Reply
  2. redleggingfordayz

    Personally I am scared of trapping ourselves in another Homer situation with people like Corbin and Keuchel. Huge pitching contracts can really sink a small market team as we have all seen. First, I DFA Billy to make another 5-6 million worth of room. I would then try and target Ryu, Holland, Happ, Lynn, and Gio Gonzales. This would hopefully save some $$ space for an impact player on the offensive side. I love Josh D as a comeback player, and if he would be willing to make a move to the OF, his bat could be huge. Then maybe trade for someone like Zach Wheeler from our outfield depth (Schebler + Top 10 propect). That would give us:

    1. Winker RF
    2. Senzel CF
    3. Votto 1B
    4. Suarez 3B
    5. Gennett 2B
    6. Donaldson LF 14 million for year 1 and then increment up 2 mill per year / 3 years
    7. Peraza SS
    8. Barnhart C

    Rotation:
    Gio – 12 million AAV / 2 years
    Ryu – 10 million AAV / 3 years
    Wheeler
    Castillo
    Disco

    Reply
    • Ghettotrout1

      I highly doubt the Mets are planning on trading wheeler given that their rotation is already much better than ours and they have given zero indication they are starting a rebuild. I would DFA or trade Billy and try to trade for Greinke because you could give up like no prospects and then sign Ryu/Evoldi or I guess Harvey. Evoldi may cost too much though but I can’t imagine he would given his injury history and lack of track record.

      Reply
      • redleggingfordayz

        Not sure trading Wheeler, who has a single year of control left, would be stating they are “rebuilding”. There were a lot of rumors going around at the deadline last year that they were listening to offers on him. I actually do not hate the Greinke idea, but the Dbacks are going to have to cover a lot of that salary for us to take him on. That would also dry up a lot of the money used on other free agents.

  3. Ty

    Doug, do you see the Reds attempting to trade RobertStevenson, Finnegan or Cody Reed this off season? Can’t see them going into the season with all three of them on the 40 man.

    Reply
    • Colorado Red

      Not going to get much for any of these guys.
      The only one someone might want (other then a minor league contract) is Reed.
      Bob Steve is a head case, and still thinks walks are ok.
      Finnegan is a bust.
      Cody sometimes looks ok, but mostly not.

      Reply
      • Patrick

        How is Finnegan a bust?

        He is the only one to show that he can pitch at the MLB level.
        He had a bad year coming off injury which was not unexpected. Quite honestly the Reds rushed him back.

        I can see being concerned about health. But when healthy he is a real good lefty reliever and potentially a solid starter.

      • Norwood Nate

        Finnegan was also brutal in AAA as a reliever. It wasn’t just his time with the Reds that he didn’t perform well. He’s two years removed from a decent season, but even that year the peripheral numbers didn’t suggest that was sustainable.

        I don’t know what constitutes a bust, but he’s not someone I’m counting on to contribute or even believe is safely secure in his roster spot.

      • ClayMC

        I want to believe in Finnegan as much as the next guy, but c’mon Patrick. Even when he was healthy and at his best, he had a below average strikeout rate, a sky-high walk rate, and an awful GB%. He snuck his ERA below 4.00 in 2016 but his peripherals all suggested his true value was of an average #5 starter at best. And that was before the injury, and before a full season of being absolutely pounded by AAA talent no matter what role they put him in.

        His stock was never that high to begin with, and it’s certainly bottomed out. I won’t go so far as to say he’s done, but betting on him to be anything more than maybe the 6th or 7th best reliever on the 2019 roster is a bad bet.

      • Doug Gray

        2016 was a tale of two halves for Finnegan. His peripherals were fine in the second half and told a story of a guy that was better than a #5, by quite a bit.

        The injuries, though, have sapped his abilities.

      • ClayMC

        2016 was so long ago, i had forgotten how strong he finished the season. That being said, I can’t imagine 8-10 starts in 2016, half of which came against September rosters, would carry much weight in projections for 2019 and beyond. It’s a fun footnote, but hardly relevant. Though I hope I’m wrong.

      • Doug Gray

        It’s definitely not carrying much weight at all for 2019 projections. Nor should it. Because he’s not that guy anymore.

        But when discussing his 2016, it’s very important to note how his season broke down if we are going to talk about what we *should have* expected from a healthy Finnegan in 2017. We just never got to see a healthy Finnegan after 2016.

  4. LB

    I’m not exactly in the “pro-trading Scooter” crowd, but IIRC, trading him and Billy would clear up about $14M, which would push the $30M available to about $45M or so (with rounding for simplicity)…

    With Johnson’s connection to Sonny Gray and Ward’s connection to AJ Pollock, maybe the Reds could take those routes…give Pollock something like 3 for $42M, and Sonny comes with a price tag around $9M…by my estimation, that leaves the Reds with a little over $20M to go after Keuchel or Corbin…

    Also if you give Keuchel/Corbin $20AAV, you could slightly backload the deal so that they only make about $15M this year, and you could also have Pollock make, say, $12M in the first year…this would free up another $7M for either a lower-end SP or bullpen/bench pieces…also the slight backloading would hypothetically not cause a problem due to the ~$20M cleared when Homer is bought out

    A lineup of:

    1. Pollock CF
    2. Winker LF
    3. Votto 1B
    4. Suarez 3B
    5. Schebler RF
    6. Senzel 2B
    7. Peraza SS
    8. Barnhart C

    – pretty good lineup top-to-bottom (I’d say better than last year), and it has a solid mix of righties and lefties

    Rotation of:

    1. Keuchel/Corbin
    2. Gray
    3. Castillo
    4. Disco
    5. Mahle (or one of the other young ones, but Mahle is who I think is the best)

    With the bullpen as it is now, plus the potential of adding another piece or two with the money saved by backloading, I think that team has pretty solid potential…but I’ll believe it when I see it

    Reply
    • Colorado Red

      Would rather resign Matt Harvey then gray. 4.9 ERA is not going to cut it.
      Trading Billy and Scooter and signing Keuchel, and Bring up Nick makes a lot of sense.
      I think Corbin is heading to the Yanks as a long time fan.
      If Corbin and Dallas are too pricey I would look at Yusei Kikuchi.
      I would also see if the Rockies are interested in trading Jon Gray.
      Since they have a really good rotation, might not cost too much to get him.
      I think Jon needs a change of scenery.

      Reply
      • redleggingfordayz

        “Would rather re-sign Matt Harvey then Gray. 4.9 ERA is not going to cut it”, but Jon Gray’s 5.12 ERA will? Sonny Gray is just as much of a bounce back candidate as Jon Gray is. His peripherals were in line with his career, and really, he just seemed to have issues pitching in NY. Could just be the pressure there. Also let us all chuckle that both of these guys are in really in the gray area in terms of SP’s ?(?¯??).

  5. bred

    Is everyone certain that the fixer they hired as pitching coach could not improve our young guys to the point that signing 30 year old plus pitchers to 3 to 5 year contracts would be a bad decision that would hurt the team in 2 or 3 years. With roster improvements needed at SS, CF and LF couldn’t that money be spent more wisely?
    Even with 2 of the above maybe 80 wins? I think with all the on field questions and the FO making much better moves the rebuild is finally set in one direction. If they get pitching, it should be a young arm with a track record that comes via a trade of any asset currently available.

    Reply
    • cinvenfan

      Exactly my thoughts. I’d like to see what Johnson can do for Stephenson/Reed/Mahle /Finnegan/Romano and even Bailey before commiting too much money and yearson a 30+ middle of the rotation type of guy.

      I’d target Sonny Gray for Scooter freeing 2b for Senzel and perhaps signing Harvey or Gio Gonzalez in a short deal. And target Andrew Miller if possible.

      Reply
      • Stock

        The Yankees are willing to give Gray away. To give up Scooter makes no sense. Additionally, I see Reed, Stephenson, Lorenzen, Mahle and Sims as better options than Gray.

    • Colorado Red

      I think we can stand pat at SS with Jose, and LF with Winkler for this year.
      SP and CF are much greater needs.
      May be able to slide Nick in the CF position.
      RF is ok for now, but could use an upgrade.
      As others have said, if we could trade for a starter (with at least 2 or 3 years of control) would be good.

      Reply
      • ClayMC

        I don’t understand why there are so few Schebler-believers. Maybe 2/3 of a season is too small of a sample size, but he provided EXCELLENT value last year, wRC+ of 120 with okay defense before the injury, 4 years of control remaining. That’s an incredible asset for a small market, budget-constrained team.

        Maybe the injury is scaring people, and it’s probably a completely valid concern given how poor his final month of the season was. But RF would be the least of my concerns in 2019. This team has way too many gaping holes elsewhere for RF to even begin to creep up on my radar as needing to be addressed in 2019. In 2021, if he’s hovering around league average? Sure, let’s look at upgrading then, but not now.

        It’s unfortunate Schebler suffered the injury. His pre-injury performance was one of the most overlooked bright spots of the 2018 season.

    • Tom

      You’ve got to let the dream of 2016 die. That crop of young pitchers is not to be relied upon for 2019. If they can level up to a rotation that has vets like Gio or Happ or Keuchel, then that is what we want. No way is Reed going to project to toe 170 innings of under 4.75 era. Let him SURPRISE us, but he has not earned trust.

      If they have 30 m, they can get Gio and Happ. They need more quantity than quality on balance.

      I’d much rather see them sign players to stabilize the franchise than ship out players – even the struggling young ones. It’s just begging for a hole in the pipeline in 2-4 years.

      Play it safe and keep all the depth you can possibly keep. Reed, Stephenson, Romano, Mahle, Sims, Mella, Lopez, Herget – they can all have a role to play on a good 2019 Reds team as they continue to approach their prime.

      This team needs an Aaron Harang, Bronson Arroyo, Edison Volquez type of 1,2,3, then they can fill in the rest with young Cueto / Leake types and let them decide with they can perform. They’ve had 3 years to do so. Didn’t look good.

      Harang (Gio)
      Bronson (Happ)
      Edison (Disco)
      Cueto (Castillo)
      Leake (Mahle)

      As you see, there is no way around signing 2 FA pitchers in order to stabilize the rotation. Just a few quality arms would go a long way to building a future for the Reds. No need to deal from the prospects who were drafted highly and have much higher value than the FA money spent on pitching.

      Whoever the Reds get, trade or FA, assuming equal chances they get injured, you’ve only lost money with the FA, but the trade has gutted your system and now you have a bum arm. Way worse outlook at that point!

      Reply
  6. redlegs4ever

    130 Mil is a nice number to here because I posted this about a month ago and since then I fear Eovaldi’s AAV has skyrocketed so 125 is probably out of the question…

    “This team needs at least 2 SPs, 4 wouldn’t hurt, maybe even a 5th, and a SS. And this could all realistically be done with a payroll around 125 Mil. Sign Jose Iglesias to play SS, sign Nathan Eovaldi to be a nice 3-4 starter. Now here comes the big one, Robbie Ray just became available from a Diamondbacks team likely to tear it down, trade Senzel, if that’s what it takes, for Ray who is a no doubt TOR pitcher when healthy and a lefty which is something the Reds have always salivated over. Ray is projected about 6 mil in arbitration, I think Iglesias wouldn’t command much more than that AAV on a 3 year deal and Nathan Eovaldi is the real high upside low risk signing of this class.”

    I think all this could still be accomplished for 130ish Million.

    Reply
    • Colorado Red

      Iglesias WAR is less the Jose Paraza’s.
      Pay more money for less is not good.
      Nathan Eovaldi would be a good signing, if we can afford it.
      I like The Robbie Ray idea.

      Reply
      • redlegs4ever

        WAR is an approximation, and the fact it thinks Jose Peraza is better than Jose Iglesias is the final nail in it’s coffin of any truth or relevance.

        Ok that was probably the fact it thought Bryce Harper was only worth 1.3 wins and that Jesse Winker was worthless but still…

  7. Jeff Sessions

    You can’t run a mlb team like a dollar store. This is just one of the cheapest owners out there. Payroll should be 150 mil. If you’re competitive, the fans will come back .

    Reply
    • Colorado Red

      Nice to spend other peoples money.
      Anyway. The Average is about 140 Mil, so we are moving in the correct direction.

      Reply
    • Tom

      I agree with this. Bailey and Scooter and Hamilton gone after 2019. Make a bump in 2019 happen now. Can’t wait any longer.

      Reply
  8. Pokey Reese's Red Hot Bat

    A few people suggesting DFA-ing Billy Hamilton but how much would he be a positive for free agent pitchers?

    A big part of my pitch for free agent pitchers concerned about the dimensions of the ballpark would be around defense – Billy Hamilton tracking everything down in the outfield, 2017 gold glove winner Tucker Barnhart behind the plate, Votto and Suarez on the corners, Senzel coming through.

    If you cut Hamilton the defense starts to look pretty brutal. That’s not a good look for attracting free agent pitching.

    Reply
    • Hoyce

      A free agent pitcher will care about
      1. Money
      2. Chances for winning

      Billy Hamilton helps with neither of these.

      Reply
  9. wizeman

    aj pollock has only played more than 120 games in a season 2 times out of last 7 years.
    would not mind a gio gonzalez signing to see what magic new pitching coach can continue to work with him. 2 years.
    would then like to see what the pitching coach can do with young arms. mahle, stephenson, reed.
    easy to beat on bailey but do believe i have read that his peripherals not that bad. we own him and have to see what this is all about.
    new hitting coach had a lot of big boppers in los angeles… not counting on him to help billy. dfa.
    scooter for prospects. not going to win this year.

    Reply
    • Tom

      I agree with most of this, but let’s not make this new pitching coaches job any harder than it needs to be. He’s inheriting the worst Reds staff ever. Get the guy a few arms to rely on so he can actually do his job.

      Reply
  10. Moses

    This is how rumors start…

    “The Cincinnati Reds reportedly have about $30M to spend this year. That is according to Paul Daugherty of the Cincinnati Enquirer.”

    While I’m sure that this number is not far off, Daugherty only refers to the ‘apparent 30M bump’, which might also include arbitration raises and eating Bailey’s option year. For all we know, it may be 20M or 45M–and I’m guessing closer to the latter–but careful about reporting someone else’s speculation as “reportedly”.

    Reply
  11. Stock

    If AZ is in rebuild mode lets help them out.

    Greinke will be cheap like Stanton was last year. Contract is just too big.

    Greinke and Ray to the Reds. AZ agrees to $10 million in 2020 and 2021.

    Change in Salary:
    2019: +38 Million
    2020: + 42 Million less 10 Million = 32 Million
    2021: + 46 Million less 10 Million = 36 Million

    India, Trammell, Bailey, Stephenson and Reed to the Diamondbacks.

    2019 Savings: 23 Million.

    This leaves you with 15 Million for 2019.

    Go out and get Adam Ottavino or Craig Kimbrell to assist in the bullpen.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.